Cleared Up Thoughts
I have to put one personal thing here, before I dive into my thoughts. I am very sad that our FSU Softball team lost tonight and are no longer in the NCAA Tournament. This was their best season on record, and I am sad that I no longer get to follow their journey this season. I just love them so much!
Now, on to my thoughts that have been cleared up!
Earlier this week, I did my readings, like I do at the beginning of every week. I read the Prensky article about digital natives and I thought about myself and also about the students I teach. I thought about how I am technically a digital native, but an earlier one. I thought about how kids today have much more experience with technology than I do. But then, after I posted in the discussion board, Rachel Wellman (shoutout!) brought up a great counterpoint and said that just because they are from this younger generation doesn't mean that they will have the same access to technology as the rest of their peers. This got me thinking about how true that really is. In Tallahassee, the northside of town is of higher socioeconomic status than the southside of town. It would make sense that the kids that come from a higher socioeconomic status would be "better" digital natives because they have what other kids don't - access. This led to me rereading (and not just skimming) the other articles that were given for our weekly reading. I then explored on my own what others had to say about digital natives. There are conflicting thoughts out there about the term and how it applies to the kids today.
In all, I now feel differently about the term. I think that it's still appropriate to use because the youth have more technology than any other generation. But I think that to say that kids will have a better opportunity to learn because they are from this generation puts a certain pressure not only on them, but on instructors as well.
Comments
Post a Comment